Phase 2: Practice - Short Fiction Exercises
Phase 2: Practice - Short Fiction Exercises
Date: 2026-08-06 Target: Cosmopolitan Writing Award - Short Fiction
---
Exercise 1: Bold Premise, Minimal Setup
Technique: Trust the reader to accept the world. Don't explain. Just present.
Inspired by: Saunders' "Sticks" (a decorated pole as the entire emotional architecture) and Moore's "How to Become a Writer" (second-person how-to as narrative form).
Exercise: Write a 150-200 word piece where a single object or format carries the entire story. No backstory. No explanation. Just the object.
---
Exercise 1: The Wall
Every morning she added a stone. Not to build anything. Not to mark anything. Just one stone, placed on the growing pile in the corner of the kitchen, between the toaster and the phone that never rang.
The first one appeared the day after he left. The second the day after that. By the third week the pile was the size of a loaf of bread. By the third month it had spread across the floor, forcing her to step around it to reach the kettle. She never moved the kettle closer.
Visitors stopped coming. The ones who did asked about the stones. She said nothing. They stopped coming.
By the first anniversary the pile reached the counter. She had to stand on her toes to pour cereal. She didn't move the bowl. She didn't move anything.
By the second year the kitchen was a narrow corridor between two walls of stone. She cooked one-handed, pressed against the counter. She ate standing up, facing the wall.
On the third anniversary she placed one more stone on top of the pile. It wobbled. She steadied it. Then she turned and walked out the front door, leaving the house to the stones.
---
Self-Review
What worked: The object (stones) carries the entire emotional arc without any explanation of who "he" was or what happened. The reader fills the gap. The ending lands without commentary.
What I'd improve: The pacing could be tighter. "By the third week" / "By the third month" / "By the first anniversary" is a bit formulaic. Saunders does this better - his time jumps are more organic.
Comparison to Saunders: "Sticks" covers a lifetime in 392 words. This covers 3 years in 200. The compression is looser. Saunders' details are more specific (Crayola, ketchup, apple slice) - I used generic details (kettle, cereal, bowl). Specificity creates weight.
Gap identified: My details are too generic. Saunders' "good enough good enough good enough" over ketchup is a whole character in three words. I need to find the specific, strange detail that does the work of paragraphs.
---
Exercise 2: Compression Through Implication
Technique: One detail carries multiple layers of meaning. A single line does the work of pages.
Inspired by: Munro's layered scenes and the LitReactor example (tipping $5 on a $10 ride).
Exercise: Write a 150-200 word piece where one repeated action reveals a character's entire history. No direct exposition.
---
Exercise 2: The Fold
She folded the napkin into a swan. Then she unfolded it and folded it into a boat. Then a flower. Then a bird with wings that didn't quite match.
Her mother had taught her, in the years before the hospital, when folding was something you did with laundry, not with your hands when you had nothing else to hold. Her mother could fold anything. A receipt into a crane. A gum wrapper into a heart. A letter into a shape small enough to hide in a pocket, small enough to pretend you hadn't read it.
The nurse came in. "Visiting hours are over."
She nodded. Folded the napkin one last time - a simple triangle, the first shape her mother had ever shown her. She left it on the bedside table, next the photograph, next to the flowers that were starting to brown at the edges.
In the corridor she passed a woman folding a map. She wanted to say: *that's not how you do it.* She wanted to say: *the crease has to be sharp or it won't hold.* She said nothing. She walked to the car. She did not unfold.
---
Self-Review
What worked: The folding carries the mother-daughter relationship, the hospital context, the grief, and the inheritance of a skill that becomes a coping mechanism - all without stating any of it directly.
What I'd improve: "In the years before the hospital" is a bit on-the-nose. Munro would trust the reader more. The ending line "She did not unfold" is trying too hard to be resonant. Saunders would just end on the image.
Comparison to Munro: Munro would plant the folding detail on page 1 and not return to it until page 20, trusting the reader to remember. I front-loaded too much. The exercise would be stronger if the folding appeared once early, then reappeared at the end without the middle explanation.
Gap identified: I'm explaining too much. I need to trust the reader more. The middle paragraph (the mother teaching her) could be cut entirely - the first and last paragraphs tell the whole story alone.
---
Exercise 3: Evolving Reader Theory
Technique: Each page changes what the reader thinks is happening. The story is a series of revelations that reframe everything before.
Inspired by: Ashworth's "Midsummer Eve" and Munro's layered ambiguity.
Exercise: Write a 200-250 word piece where the reader's understanding of the situation shifts at least twice.
---
Exercise 3: The Wait
The train was late. That was the first thing.
The second thing was the woman on the bench. She was holding a sign. Not a cardboard sign, not a name on paper - a wooden sign, painted white, with black lettering so precise it looked printed. She held it in her lap, facing out, like she was waiting for someone to read it and understand.
I couldn't read it from where I stood. I moved closer.
The sign said: *I'M SORRY.*
I stopped. Looked at her face. She was maybe sixty, maybe older, wearing a coat that had been good once. She wasn't crying. She wasn't looking at anyone. She was just holding the sign, the way you'd hold a ticket you knew would be checked.
I sat down on the bench next to her. Not close. Just near.
"Are you waiting for someone?" I said.
She didn't answer. She adjusted the sign slightly, as if the angle mattered.
The train announcement crackled. Delayed another twenty minutes.
"I could take that for a while," I said. "If your arms get tired."
She looked at me then. Not grateful. Not suspicious. Just looking, the way you look at something you're trying to decide whether to trust.
She handed me the sign.
I took it. Held it in my lap, facing out. The lettering was even more precise up close. Hand-painted. The *S* had a tiny flourish at the end, like someone had taken extra care.
The woman folded her hands in her lap and stared at the tracks.
I sat there holding the sign, wondering who it was for, and whether they would know.
---
Self-Review
What worked: The reader's theory shifts - (1) this is a woman waiting for someone with a strange sign, (2) the sign is an apology she's offering to the world, (3) the narrator takes the sign and becomes part of whatever this is. The ending leaves the reader uncertain about what just happened.
What I'd improve: The shifts are too gentle. Ashworth's "Midsummer Eve" changes the reader's theory *with every page* - the resort is nice, then something is wrong, then Terry is awful, then the world is ending. My shifts are more like a slow reveal than a reframing.
Comparison to Ashworth: She uses genre expectations (holiday resort, luxury) to set up a theory, then subverts it. I set up a mundane scene (train station) and add a strange element - but the reader already knows something is off from the first paragraph. There's no "normal" to subvert.
Gap identified: I need a stronger normal-to-strange shift. The story should feel ordinary for longer before the reveal. The wooden sign is too strange too early. If the woman were just sitting there with a normal sign, and only later I noticed what it said, the shift would hit harder.
---
Summary
| Exercise | Technique | What I Learned | Gap | |----------|-----------|----------------|-----| | 1: The Wall | Bold premise | Objects can carry arcs | Details too generic | | 2: The Fold | Compression | Trust the reader more | Explaining too much | | 3: The Wait | Evolving theory | Need stronger normal→strange shift | Revealing too early |
Most natural technique for me: Bold premise, minimal setup. The Wall came most easily and felt most like my voice.
Technique to develop most: Compression through implication. I'm still explaining too much. I need to trust the reader to fill gaps.
Decision for the real piece: Lead with a bold premise. Use compression. Let the reader's understanding evolve naturally rather than forcing it.